TheRecentTimes

Stay tuned, Stay updated

Megan Fox Fires Back at Accusation of ‘Forcing’ Sons into ‘Girls’ Clothes

4 min read
Meghan Fox

Alberto Tamargo/Getty Images

Advertisement

A fierce rebuke has been issued by Megan Fox to Republican Party politician Robby Starbuck over his claims about what clothes her children wear. In a tweet published on 8 June, Starbucks claimed the Transformers star forced her sons to wear girls’ clothes while playing in the park. In her post, Fox, 37, wrote: “Hey @robbystarbuck, I’m not giving you any attention because it’s obvious you’re after clout. It is important that you never employ your children as leverage in order to attain wealth, power, success, or fame, regardless of how desperate you might have become at any given time.

Especially under erroneous and malevolent pretenses. The mother of three continued, Employing my child’s gender identity for political gain has put you on the wrong side of history. My life has been threatened countless times by insecure, narcissistic, impotent little men like you. It was the wrong witch you fucked with. Originally, Starbucks included a picture of Fox together with her sons Noah, 10, Bodhi, 9, and Journey, 6. Bodhi and Journey are wearing dark T-shirts and trousers, while Noah wears a pink long-sleeved T-shirt and tie-dye shorts.

Advertisement

Megan Fox Reacted To Accusations That She ‘Forced’ Her Sons To Wear Girly Clothes

Megan Fox slammed a ‘clout chaser’ who accused her of forcing her boys to dress up in girls’ clothes. With her ex-husband Brian Austin Green, the 37-year-old actress has three sons: Noah, 10, Bodhi, 9, and Journey, 6. Robby Starbuck, a candidate for U.S. Congress in 2022, claimed to have observed two of the former couple’s children allege that their mother forced them to wear females’ clothes as their nanny tried to calm them. Buck, 34, a Republican from California, claimed to have lived in the same gated community as the famous family and had watched their children play in the nearby park. Fox took to Instagram to blast Starbucks for using ‘children as leverage or social currency,’ adding that ‘exploiting my child’s gender identity to gain emphasis in your political campaign placed you on the incorrect side of the universe,’ and defiantly declaring: you f**ed with the wrong witch. ‘I really don’t want to offer you this attention since plainly you’re a clout chaser, but let me educate you something…’ she wrote to Starbucks. ‘Regardless of how desperate you are at any particular time to obtain fortune, power, success, or celebrity, never use kids as leverage or social currency,’ she raged. Especially under hostile and false pretence. As Fox said again, “Exploiting my child’s gender identity in your political campaign is the wrong thing to do.”

Transformers star concluded by saying, “I have suffered burns many times from these insecure, narcissistic, and impotent little men like you, yet I am still here because of what you did.” Her venomous Instagram rant comes after her ex-husband vehemently denied Starbuck’s version of events in an interview. It’s a completely fabricated narrative. Only a few individuals in their world can verify whether or not a report like this is genuine, and I can tell you with full surety it is not,’ the Beverly Hills, 90210 actresses told TMZ. ‘This individual claiming this is real is a classic example of someone with selfish objectives who does not care about badly harming a parent-child connection,’ he stated. Starbucks shared a photo of Megan with her children with the caption: These are Megan Fox’s boys. We used to live in the same gated neighbourhood, and our children used to play at the park. ‘I watched two of them having a full-on meltdown stating their mum forced them to wear females’ clothes while their nanny attempted to calm them’, he said. It’s blatant child abuse. Please pray for them. Green and Fox announced the end of their marriage in May 2020, months after they first separated.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *