TheRecentTimes

Stay tuned, Stay updated

Meta Updates Guidelines: Controversial Policy Shifts Allow Gender-Based Remarks

3 min read
Meta

DREW ANGERER/AFP via Getty Images

Advertisement

Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, has made sweeping updates to its content moderation policies. The changes, announced on January 7, have sparked significant controversy, particularly over the relaxed rules allowing derogatory terms and harmful language targeting women, transgender individuals, and other marginalized groups.

Major Policy Updates Explained

According to reports from CNN and Wired, the revised guidelines permit content that refers to women as “household objects or property.” Similarly, transgender and non-binary individuals can now be labeled with dehumanizing terms like “it.” These changes fall under Meta’s broader relaxation of restrictions on speech tied to protected characteristics, such as gender identity, race, and ethnicity.

Meta’s Chief Global Affairs Officer, Joel Kaplan, defended the policy shift, stating in a blog post, “It’s not right that things can be said on TV or the floor of Congress, but not on our platforms.” CEO Mark Zuckerberg echoed this sentiment, suggesting that previous moderation policies were “out of touch with mainstream discourse.”

Expanded Scope of Hate Speech

The updated guidelines also ease restrictions on gender-based discussions in specific contexts. For instance, conversations limiting certain jobs, such as military or teaching roles, by gender or sexual orientation are now permitted if tied to religious beliefs. Similarly, socially exclusive language about access to spaces like bathrooms, schools, or health groups is now allowed, provided other guidelines are followed.

Despite these relaxed rules, some exclusions from the prior guidelines remain intact. Content involving Holocaust denial, blackface, and comparisons of people of color to farm equipment continues to be prohibited. Additionally, posts targeting immigrants and asylum-seekers with terms like “insects” or “pathogens” are still banned.

Backlash and Public Concern

The changes have drawn widespread criticism, with many questioning the ethics of enabling harmful rhetoric. Critics argue that the revised policies could exacerbate online toxicity and harassment, particularly toward women and LGBTQ+ individuals. The removal of a key statement in the Hateful Conduct Policy—acknowledging that hateful speech could “promote offline violence”—has further fueled concerns about potential real-world consequences.

President-elect Donald Trump, who has had a contentious history with Meta, praised the updates. Speaking at Mar-a-Lago, Trump said, “I think they’ve come a long way. Meta. Facebook. I think they’ve come a long way.” When asked if these changes were a response to his prior criticisms of Zuckerberg, Trump speculated, “Probably. Yeah, probably.”

While Meta defends these updates as a step toward aligning its platforms with broader societal discourse, critics argue that they risk amplifying harmful narratives. As Meta continues to navigate its role as a social media giant, the implications of these policy changes remain to be seen, both for users and the broader digital landscape.

The decision to allow derogatory language under the guise of free speech has sparked a heated debate, raising questions about the balance between open dialogue and protecting marginalized communities.

Advertisement

Hi, I'm Shivam Kumar. I'm pursuing Journalism honors from the IP University. I love the skill of writing and looking forward to learn more of it. Also I love traveling and experiencing new things every day....

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *