R Kelly, 54, was recently found guilty of sexually assaulting several children and women during his career. Let’s have a look at the case and the view of R. Kelly’s Defense Attorney Deveraux Cannick on the case guilty verdict.
Sexual abuse of children, creation of pornographic material. Destruction of evidence, abduction, and forced labor was among the eight charges of sexual exploitation. That the Chicago native was charged and convicted of. He was indeed convicted with one charge of racketeering for being the instigator of a coercive operation. That entices women and kids to be abuse by him.
Several believe the artist will spend much time behind bars. Despite the fact that his sentence isn’t scheduled until May 4th, 2022, more than eight months away. For the past six weeks, the case has already been ongoing.
The Prosecution of Kelly’s Case
During the trial, R Kelly was prosecuted by a multitude of separate attorneys.
The prosecution, and on the other hand, was managed by Elizabeth Geddes. A 15-year experienced veteran of the United States Attorney general’s Office in Brooklyn. Elizabeth seems to have a bunch of racketeering expertise and gave the closing argument in R Kelly’s trial.
R. Kelly’s Defense Attorney
Deveraux Cannick, R Kelly’s attorney, represented kelly during the six-week trial.
The Bronx County District Attorney graduated from Fordham University School of Law. And also has dedicated the majority of his employment there. He has worked on both civil and criminal matters throughout his career. And has been involving in a number of high-profile cases.
He was chosen as the main prosecution in the Citizens of the State of New York v. Larry Davis case in 1990, one of the most well-known trails in the Bronx. In which Larry Davis was accused of several killings.
Deveraux Cannick on R Kelly’s guilty verdict
Following the convicted judgment, Deveraux and R Kelly expressed their disappointment with the outcome. Claiming that the defense team will challenge.
He quoted as saying, “He was not expecting this conviction since depending on the evidence. Why else would he predict this verdict?” “You witnessed testimony after eyewitnesses provide three, four, or five different accounts of what happened here,” says the narrator. He said, “The authorities cherry-picked the portion they assume will be a repetition of something like the scenario initially put out through Surviving R Kelly.”
Deveraux argued that the state “ignored the discrepancies”. That the testimonies provided and because he is “unhappy”. Not only by the “judge’s verdict” but also through the “court’s verdict.”
Deveraux Cannick, who entered Kelly’s defense attorney only months well before the long-awaited hearing. Claimed in the trial that his victims were previous admirers who grew enraged after losing favor with him. And also that his sexual encounters were voluntary. He made news when he compared Kelly to Martin Luther King, Jr., the assassinated civil rights leader.